(no subject)
Jan. 28th, 2009 08:40 amHere's the PETA advert that's apparently not going to be shown during the Superbowl because it's 'too sexy'. I would have thought a more valid reason would have been it's 'too shit', but then I suspect it's rather difficult to make pumpkin lickin' look sexy.
But it does seem that PETA are incapable of doing anything these days unless it involves naked women in it somewhere. The 'action' against cows milk had a couple of naked pregnant women in a stall somewhere a few years back, classy! Are all PETA advertising campaigns now worked out on the basis of how they will use breasts to campaign against cruelty to animals?
But it does seem that PETA are incapable of doing anything these days unless it involves naked women in it somewhere. The 'action' against cows milk had a couple of naked pregnant women in a stall somewhere a few years back, classy! Are all PETA advertising campaigns now worked out on the basis of how they will use breasts to campaign against cruelty to animals?