Date: 2005-10-03 09:32 pm (UTC)
The short version is, they generally don't - the KJV is a useful stopping-off point for a lot of Fundamentalist Protestant groups, because it is in English, has the authenticity of age and is demonstrably not Catholic. So, you roll with the punches. In the specific case of the description of Mary as a parthenos, you say that clearly they meant Virgin, whatever the origin word was, because that is how the story is told in the Bible you are holding, and therefore this is how God wants his story to be told. Since it's in the Bible, it's the literal truth, because if it wasn't the literal truth God wouldn't let it be in the Bible.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

blahflowers: (Default)
blahflowers

June 2015

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
212223 24252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 10th, 2025 12:11 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios